18921237919
我們知道在托福考試當(dāng)中，綜合寫作一直是同學(xué)們比較頭痛的一個(gè)問題，因?yàn)樗粌H包含了寫作，也包含了聽力當(dāng)中的內(nèi)容，所以其實(shí)是對(duì)大家的英語能力，包括聽和寫的能力的綜合性的考驗(yàn)。
今天老師就帶大家一起來分析一下同學(xué)們?cè)?strong>托福綜合寫作的常見問題，你中了幾個(gè)？這些問題我們應(yīng)該如何避免？
The lecture mainly talked about the ancient Europe connected with native Americans, North, by transporting silver coin to there, with some evidence, the lecture assumed that the history of connection with Native American was history fake. Nonetheless, the professor in the listening material voted against the content mentioned in the passage for several reasons and controversies.
First off, contrary to the content mentioned in the reading passage that the distance between Europe and America is too far away for traveling at that time, the professor demonstrated that the Norse, now in Canada, has the same site with the history records, which can explain the geological evidence for available traveling. Furthermore, ancient Europe loved to obtain objectives from all over the world, therefore, it is likely for them to reach the native America to attain things and bring back to Europe.
Moreover, to convince audience not to believe the context listed in the article that no other coins found beside those, the speaker in the listening record illustrated that it is necessary for Europe to go far away, which is also permanent. As we all know, silver coins are much valuable and could be considered as trading material. Thus, for the religion reason, Europes have appropriate reasons to take coins back to their homeland, and will not leave for Norse. Finally, to further oppose the content in the lecture that there is even no use for Norse as European Coins, the spoken man in the listening lecture deemed that silver coins are actually very attractive and unusual for Norse, hence, they were willing to trade for those coins. For instance, neckless and other jewelries are so attractive for Norse, so they trade for them by using their local items. All in all, the professor in the listening material disagreed with all of the opinions mentioned by author for several reasons.
講座主要講的是古代歐洲與北美土著的聯(lián)系，通過把銀幣運(yùn)到那里，并結(jié)合一些證據(jù)，假設(shè)與美洲土著的聯(lián)系史是假的。盡管如此，聽力材料中的教授出于幾個(gè)原因和爭(zhēng)議投了反對(duì)票。
首先，與閱讀文章中提到的歐洲和美洲之間的距離太遠(yuǎn)，不適合當(dāng)時(shí)旅行的內(nèi)容相反，教授證明了現(xiàn)在在加拿大的挪威人與歷史記錄有相同的地點(diǎn)，這可以解釋可供旅行的地質(zhì)證據(jù)。此外，古代歐洲喜歡從世界各地獲取目標(biāo)，因此，他們很有可能到達(dá)美洲本土去實(shí)現(xiàn)目標(biāo)并帶回歐洲。
此外，為了說服聽眾不要相信文章中所列的上下文，即在那些硬幣旁邊找不到其他硬幣，演講者在聽力記錄中說明，歐洲有必要走得更遠(yuǎn)，這也是永久性的。眾所周知，銀幣非常珍貴，可以作為交易材料。因此，出于宗教原因，歐洲人有適當(dāng)?shù)睦碛砂延矌艓Щ刈约旱淖鎳?guó)，而不會(huì)去挪威。
最后，為了進(jìn)一步反對(duì)講座中的內(nèi)容，甚至沒有使用北歐貨幣作為歐洲貨幣，聽講座的人認(rèn)為銀幣實(shí)際上對(duì)北歐人非常有吸引力和不尋常，因此他們?cè)敢庥眠@些硬幣來交換。例如，無頸珠寶和其他珠寶對(duì)挪威人來說非常有吸引力，所以他們用當(dāng)?shù)氐纳唐愤M(jìn)行交易?？傊?，聽力材料中的教授不同意作者提到的所有觀點(diǎn).
姓名
手機(jī)號(hào)
